Read the New York Times coverage here, which indicates tighter regulation than has been the norm to date.
Read another story here about likely first amendment challenges to the new regulations.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
A resource and forum for students at the University of California, Davis.
Related blogs and sites
Labels
- agency (1)
- agriculture (1)
- animals (2)
- asbestos (3)
- automobiles (5)
- California (3)
- causation (3)
- children (2)
- class action (4)
- comparative fault (2)
- compensation schemes (6)
- contingency fees (1)
- contributory negligence (1)
- criminal law (8)
- defamation (1)
- defense counsel (1)
- drug warnings (2)
- elderly (1)
- emotional distress (4)
- environmental/toxic torts (6)
- expert witnesses (1)
- FDA (8)
- federal regulation (10)
- food production (2)
- food safety (3)
- fraud (2)
- Good Samaritan (2)
- government immunity (1)
- immunity (1)
- intentional torts (2)
- international (6)
- juror (1)
- jury (3)
- law and economics (3)
- lawyers (1)
- marketing defect (3)
- mass tort (11)
- medical (1)
- minors (1)
- negligence (14)
- negligence per se (1)
- plaintiff vulnerability (3)
- plaintiffs counsel (1)
- pre-emption (3)
- privacy (1)
- product recall (5)
- products liability (21)
- proximate cause (1)
- public utilities (2)
- punitive damages (2)
- recall (1)
- rescuers (2)
- respondeat superior (1)
- rhetorical hyperbole (1)
- risk spreading (1)
- salmonella (2)
- sexual abuse (2)
- statute of limitations (1)
- strict liability (3)
- suicide (1)
- tobacco (7)
- tort reform (2)
- train accident (1)
- U.S.Supreme Court (4)
- workers' compensation (5)
- wrongful death (1)
No comments:
Post a Comment